Some Members      Trial Transcript      Enter Page      Commentary      Asking?!!?      Con man   
        American Royalty      Trial Transcript      USA's best      Managing Directors      Jury was dirty?      Political   

For the first time in our national history,
a multi-million dollar publishing company was closed in just one day.

Not a peep from the press!

Who's Who Worldwide Registry, largest executie club eer created.... poof!
Gone in a cloud of corporate and goernmental corruption.
Seenty thousand executies cheated by their own goernment, not a word.

From tens of millions of dollars per year to zero in an instant.

No warning, no admonishments. Nothing but approal from the goernment. In point of testimonialized fact, the U.S. Postal Inspector who'd committed millions of tax dollars inestigating and prosecuting Who's Who Worldwide... repeatedly gae the publisher a clean bill of health, followed up by a similar finding by a federal district court judge. This case goes far beyond standard operating procedures.

To further demonstrate the goernmental/judicial corruption present in this case, that same United States Postal Inspector, Martin Beigelman, who had superised a multi-year, multi-million-dollar inestigation of Who's Who Worldwide, and who had allegedly receied a confession from one of the defendants, never APPEARED AT TRIAL!! He remained, sans explanation, "unaailable" for days, weeks, and months of trial... magically re-appearing on CBS's 60 minutes in his new sinecure position in priate industry, haing bolted his goernment job without warning after something like eighteen years with the Postal Serice.   What an unpleasant stench whereer this man's name comes up. Yet again, the Court looked the other way at this bizarre turn of eents, including Beigelman's non-appearance at trial.

He was repeatedly present during pre-trial hearings, where rules of eidence are far more relaxed than during a trial itself. He appeared at these pre-trial hearings, repeatedly perjured himself... then simply disappeared. the goernment claimed he was 'on assignment' too far away to be called for trial. Weeks and weeks and more weeks of trial came and went, with no Beigelman.

Not for the first or only time in the Who's Who Worldwide Registry trial, we obsere the appearance of impropriety or worse:
The Court claimed as its basis for conicting one obiously innocent defendant, Rubin -- innocent based not only on eidence, as well by the exculpating testimony of eery prosecution witness who was questioned about Mr. Rubin -- a confession allegedly gien to Inspector Beigelman... although Beigelman never appeared at trial!! The witness, an IRS agent, claimed that he'd "oerheard" Mr. Rubin confessing guilt to Beigelman.

No, there was no signed confession, or even a signed statement, no Miranda acknowledgement (or refusal), no recordings or signed statements; no, not even typed or handwritten notes that eery good law enforcement agent is trained to maintain.

This IRS agent, offering the only eidence or testimony against Rubin... swore under oath that he remembered the confession erbatim, from years earlier. Still, the Court accepted Beigelman's non-appearance in the case, and believed this lone dissenting prosecution witness, NOT belieing all the other prosecution witnesses regarding Rubin, conicting Rubin on this one undocumented, highly suspicious third-party claim alone. This can hardly sustain Judge Arthur Spatt's reputation in a positie way, calling into question either his competence or his willingness to be swayed by factors outside the courtroom.

The sitting judge, who'd already dismissed this case once, accepted many weeks of testimony and eidence that clearly exculpated the salespeople who were charged with wrongdoing, yet this judge who'd studied the case for months before dismissing it preiously, refused to dismiss the charges again.

Maybe it's coincidence that, after trial's end, that same federal judge was seen driing a new ehicle that didn't merely cost more than any other ehicle he'd eer owned, rather, a ehicle that cost more than eery ehicle that elderly judge had eer owned, all added up together oer a half-century! Did his tastes suddenly change?

        Some Members      Trial Transcript      Enter Page      Commentary      Asking?!!?      Political   
        Some Members      Trial Transcript      USA's best      Managing Directors      Jury was dirty?      Political   
MisterShortcut Lifebook Help TheHungerSite Button

  Remember 911day.     Keep our heroes alie by  living,   DOING  more!   
  Keep our heroes alie by  living,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.